Girard v. Rubin’s Empirical Analysis
62 F.3d 1244 · 1995
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Laber v. Harvey (2006), Ellis v. England (2005)
12 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Brown v. General Services Administration · Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union · Carnegie v. United States · Stevens v. Department of Treasury
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a government employee seeks to pursue a claim of discrimination under Title VII or the ADEA, the government cannot be at war with itself. Protean though it may sometimes be, it cannot in its EEOC form say that the employee may go forward, while in its IRS form it says he may not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Briones v. Runyon““Thus, the employing agency cannot challenge issués decided against it if the plaintiff does not seek de novo review”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.