Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 F.3d 1414

Docket No. 94-7361.

Brown v. State T

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 10, 1995. Submitted: July 25, 1995 Decided: August 10, 1995

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-10

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. CA-93-2558-3-OBD (D.S.C. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/62/f3d/1414 · .json · Public domain