Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 F.3d 1414

Docket No. 95-6533.

King v. Cavanaugh

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 25, 1995. Decided Aug. 10, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-10

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Jackson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lloyd C. King, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting in part the magistrate judge's recommendation reveals no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. King v. Cavanaugh, No. CA-94-1356-3-OBC (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/62/f3d/1414 · .json · Public domain