Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 F.3d 1415

Docket No. 95-6157.

David Albert Simms v. Edward W. Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 25, 1995. Decided: Aug. 10, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-10

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Kenneth Phillips v. Bishop L. Robinson Richard A. Lanham Merry Coplin Barbara Taylor, Rn Sewall Smith

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David Albert Simms, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Simms v. Murray, No. CA-93-1091-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/62/f3d/1415 · .json · Public domain