Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 F.3d 1421

Docket No. 94-3873.

Kjeldahl v. Glickman

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 13, 1995. Filed: July 27, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-07-13

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2015

22 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-07-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Willie Kjeldahl appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the District of Minnesota granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing his amended complaint with prejudice. After de novo review, we conclude that no error appears. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

The Court has substituted Daniel R. Glickman for Mike Espy, pursuant to Fed. R. App. R. 43(c)

1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota

/62/f3d/1421 · .json · Public domain