Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 F.3d 252 - Warmus v. Melahn

Warmus v. Melahn’s Empirical Analysis

62 F.3d 252 · 1995

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
January 2012
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2012

11 federal appellate ·

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Allen v. McCurry · Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n · Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd. · Pennzoil Company v. Texaco Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]or Younger purposes, the State’s trial-and-appeals process is treated as a unitary system”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.