Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Advocates For Life, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Bell v. Hood · Wrenn v. McFadden · Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic · Texas State Commission for the Blind v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the potential for confusion of the jury; (2) whether the losing party’s defenses apply to the count upon which the verdict is being sustained; (3) the strength of the evidence supporting the count relied upon to sustain the verdict; and (4) the extent to which the same disputed issues of fact apply to the various legal theories.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a general rule, `a general jury verdict will be upheld only if there is substantial evidence to support each and every theory of liability submitted to the jury.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Webb v. Sloan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.