Hai Hai Vuong v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
62 F.3d 673 · 1995
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Burdine v. Johnson (2001), Rector v. Johnson (1997)
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Lockett v. Ohio · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Eddings v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[T]he fact that a juror might view the evidence of youth as aggravating, as opposed to mitigating, does not mean that the rule of Lockett is violated.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Soria v. Johnson“acted objectively unreasonably in failing to object and that he was prejudiced by the failure to object.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.