Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-05-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1
Richard Lewis Beckwith appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Beckwith v. Shearin,
No. CA-02-1907-AW (D. Md. filed Oct. 28, 2002 & entered Oct. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
