62 F. Supp. 2d 408 - Palermo v. Abrams’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Carden v. Arkoma Associates · Williamson v. Tucker · Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League · Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo · Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Montle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“place where he has his true, fixed home and principal establishment, and to which, whenever he is absent, he has the intention of returning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.