Dickson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1879
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 1997
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This is an unsightly literary blemish, but not a grave legal infirmity. In school the composition would not pass, but it may be tolerated in the courthouse. The meaning is clear, though the verbal in accuracy is glaring. We may regret that those who write affidavits and warrants guard their pronouns with so little vigilance, but we cannot hold, as matter of law, that tlieir bad grammar, vitiates the documents.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““An affidavit complying with the following form shall, in all cases, be sufficient: Georgia, ................ County. “Personally came A. B., who on oath says that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, C. D. did, on the .... day of............... in the year ....... in the county aforesaid, commit the offense of (insert here all information describing offense * * * ) and this deponent makes this affidavit that a warrant may issue for his arrest. A. B. * * *” § 27-104 [1965 Supp.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.