State v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2022
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co. · MacQuarrie v. McLaughlin · 189 So. 2d 254 - State v. Hickman · Vasquez v. State · Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Rheem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a well settled rule of statutory construction that exceptions to legislative enactments must be strictly construed”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a request for temporary custody.” This court’s reliance on article IV(a) for this statement, however, was misplaced because article IV(a) states in pertinent part that "[t]he appropriate officer ... shall be entitled to have a prisoner against whom he [or she] has lodged a detainer ... made available ... upon presentation of a written request for temporary custodyl.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Batungbacal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.