Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 Haw. 563 - State v. Naeole

State v. Naeole’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
4
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 86 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Silva (1993), State v. Wallace (1996)

2 federal appellate · 86 state decisions

30019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · California v. Arizona · 54 Cal. 2d 621 - People v. Gould · Larrison v. United States · United States v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal, the test to ascertain the legal sufficiency of the evidence is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the trier of fact. * * * It matters not if a conviction under the evidence as so considered might be deemed to be against the weight of the evidence so long as there is substantial evidence tending to support the requisite findings for conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “officer who conducted the photographic lineup may also testify to such identification, ... but only where the person making it is present at trial, testifies to the prior identification, and is subject to cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is the general rule that evidence to which no objection has been made may properly be considered by the trier of fact and its admission will not constitute ground for reversal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.