¶1The facts in this case are substantially the same, and the law questions presented are identical with those decided in Harris v. International Steel & Iron Construction Company (No. 9,079), ante 64, 112 N. E. 532, decided by this court this term. On the authority of that decision the judgment in this ease is affirmed.
62 Ind. App. 696
Harris v. Rogers
Decided June 29, 1916
Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1916-06-29
Prom Clay Circuit Court; John M. Rawley, Judge. Action' between Curtis Harris and others and Ira Rogers and another. Prom a judgment for the latter, the former appeals.
Relies on Harris v. International Steel & Iron Construction Co.
Affirmed · Decided 1916-06-29