Hudson v. Barratt’s Empirical Analysis
1900
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1941
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Casoni v. . Jerome · Proctor v. Dicklow · Nevitt v. Woodburn · City of Atchison v. Twine · In Re the Estate of Hood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No good reason can be seen why the sureties on the executor’s bond should be required to answer in court and harassed with- litigation until it has been determined whether default has been made" by the executor, or whether there is any liability on the bond, by the tribunal specially provided to make such determination.” (Hudson v. Barratt, 62 Kan. 137, 147 , 61 Pac. 737 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Galloway v. Freeburg · Fry v. Riley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.