Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 KAN 621 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
7
states following
April 1972
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 1972

13 state decisions

4019011910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Schweiter · State v. Smith · State v. . McDuffie · Wheat v. State · State v. Grow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In' other words, where evidence to prove the negative averment is not peculiarly within the knowledge of the defendant, but is also within the knowledge and control of, or, upon reasonable effort and by the exercise of proper diligence, may be secured by, the state, then •the prosecution is bound to produce such evidence, and, failing to do so, the defendant ought to be acquitted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.