Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 KAN 756 - Anderson v. Pierce

Anderson v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
January 1961
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1961

17 state decisions

701901191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Ritz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every presumption is in favor of the general verdict. The special findings must overthrow it or it must stand. In the absence of the evidence from the record, we must assume all of these findings to have support in the evidence and all must be construed together.” (Page 759.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.