Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 Mont. 49

In re Slagle

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1921

Montana Supreme Court · decided 1921-12-21

<p> Attorneys—Disbarment—Unprofessional Conduct—Retention of Funds of Client—Reparation—Suspension Deemed Sufficient Punishment. </p> <p>1. Where an attorney, charged with failure to pay over promptly funds to his client collected by him, confessed his delinquency, had made reparation and made explanation of his conduct, suspension from his office as attorney and counselor at law deemed sufficient punishment.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1926

1 state decisions

Relies on In re Jewell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1921-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Opinion:

PER CURIAM.'

¶2Original proceeding on the complaint of the Attorney Gen[1] eral against Clyde Slagle, an attorney and counselor at law of the courts of Montana, to procure his disbarment. In his answer the accused admitted the facts constituting the charge substantially as alleged in the complaint. Final hearing was then had before the court; service by a referee to take testimony being deemed unnecessary. The facts thus disclosed, supplemented by an explanatory statement by the accused himself, present a case in its substantial particulars the same as that presented in.the ease of In re Jewell, 60 Mont. 602, 201 Pac. 266. The court has concluded that the course pursued in that case may properly be pursued in the instant one. It is accordingly ordered that Clyde Slagle be suspended from his office as attorney and counselor at law for a period of ninety days from this date, and that, at the expiration of that time, he may be restored to his office upon paying to the clerk of this court the costs incurred herein and presenting to the court satisfactory proof of his good moral character in the meantime.

/62/mont/49 · .json · Public domain