Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 N.C. App. 239 - Cunningham v. Brown

62 N.C. App. 239 - Cunningham v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2002

22 state decisions

160198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manganello v. Permastone, Inc. · 49 N.C. App. 642 - Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc. · 60 N.C. App. 145 - Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. Evans · 51 N.C. App. 264 - Cunningham v. Brown · Cowan v. Murrows Transfer, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the better practice . . . for the trial judge to reserve his decision on the motion and allow the case to be submitted to the jury. If the jury returns a verdict in favor of the moving party, no decision on the motion is necessary and an appeal may be avoided. If the jury finds for the nonmoving party, the judge may reconsider the motion and enter a judgment notwithstanding the verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(b), provided he is convinced the evidence was insufficient. On appeal, if the motion proves to have been improperly granted, the appellate court then has the option of ordering entry of the judgment on the verdict, thereby eliminating the expense and delay involved in a retrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.