62 N.C. App. 318 - Daugherty v. Daugherty’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 1992
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jolly v. Wright · Mauney v. Mauney · 37 N.C. App. 371 - Lee v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant, who appeared at the contempt hearing without counsel, first cites as error the court’s failure to ascertain and find whether defendant desired and was able to employ counsel, and whether the assistance of counsel was necessary for a proper presentation of his case. According to the record, the defendant’s possible indigency and possible need of and desire for court appointed counsel were not mentioned by de fendant or anyone else. The.contention is that the court’s failure to initiate about and resolve these matters was manifest prejudicial error as a matter of law. We disagree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.