Davis v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2021
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Actual occupancy is not absolutely required in every case where a homestead is claimed. Nevertheless occupancy is the test established by the statute, and it is only through liberal construction to meet the beneficent ends of the statute that certain substitutes therefor have been permitted. The most usual is what has been called constructive occupancy, as, for example, where property occupied as a homestead has been temporarily vacated without abandonment, and with a foona fide and subsisting intention to return. Another has been permitted in case of vacant and unimproved property in present process of preparation for a home, and in other cases where property purchased for use as a homestead is for some temporary reason not available as such, but is being prepared as fast as may reasonably be expected. In such' cases, where there is a bona fide present intention to occupy the property as a homestead, followed by actual occupancy within a reasonable time, it is. entirely within the bounds of legitimate construction to hold the property as a homestead. * * * There must be a present intention to occupy it as a homestead as soon as circumstances reasonably permit, evidenced by. acts of preparation indicating such intention.” • ;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Malloy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.