Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 N.M. 111 - State v. Bailey

State v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Pearce v. Cox (1965), State v. James (1966)

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

15019561960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jackson · State v. Trujillo · State v. Gallegos · State v. Vigil · 23 Okla. Crim. 243 - Golden v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “<i* * ‡ [N]ot only was accorded a hearing but he waived this right by his plea. State v. Gallegos, 46 N.M. 387 , 129 P.2d 634 ; State v. Trujillo, 33 N.M. 370 , 266 P. 922 ; State v. Vigil, 33 N.M. 365 , 266 P. 920 .” (Our Emphasis)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We conclude that in allowing the testimony of the witness to be read, the accused was denied his constitutional right of being confronted by the witnesses against him. The mere fact that the witness was absent from the jurisdiction of the court, was not enough. The exercise of due diligence on the part of the officers, in an effort to secure his attendance, was essential to the admission of the testimony of the absent witness. 62 N.M. at 113 , 305 P.2d at 726 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.