Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 NY 202 - Jones v. . Barlow

Jones v. . Barlow’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
January 1945
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1945 · most notably Huntington v. Attrill (1892), Loverin v. McLaughlin (1896)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

13018751880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the obligation is wholly statutory, and adjudged to be a penalty, it is in substance, as.it is in form, a remedy for the collection of the corporate debts. The act is penal as against the defaulting trustees, but is remedial in favor- of creditors. The liability, of defaulting trustees is measured by the obligation of the company, and a discharge of the obligations of the company, or a release of the debt, bars the action against the trustees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Whatever limitations and conditions attach to the corporate and primary obligation, whether attaching to it at its inception or growing out of subsequent lawful agreements of the parties, necessarily limit and qualify the liability of the trustees.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.