Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 NY 215 - Marsden v. . Cornell

Marsden v. . Cornell’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 1960
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1960 · most notably Karst v. . Gane (1893), In re New York Economical Printing Co. (1901)

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 18 state decisions

701875188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But he chose in 1870 to avail himself of the provision of the statute which for one year kept his mortgage good for him. He thus brought it under the purview and operation of the statute—within its grasp, so to speak. It then became as if the statute was passed for it alone, and applied to it alone, of all the chattel mortgages in the state. Then the third section of the statute of 1864 said of it, as if of it alone: This mortgage shall cease to be valid as against subsequent purchasers in good faith, after the expiration of one year from the 22d September, 1870, unless within 30 days next preceding that expiration the plaintiff shall file it again, and unless he shall file therewith a statement of his interest in the property. This he did not, and lost the benefit of his security, if any bona fide purchaser came in.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.