People v. Morse’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2010
4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“court decision was not identified in the Memorandum in Support, but one commentator has speculated that an unreported Westchester County case, People v Larkin , was the one that the Legislature had in mind (Hechtman, 1978 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 39 [1975 ed], Penal Law § 60.01, 1987 Supp Pamph, at 90). OPINION OF THE COURT Titone, J. Authorized by Penal Law § 60.01 (2) (d), a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.