Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 NY2D 494 - Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.

Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

777
cited by 777 later decisions
7
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

178 federal appellate · 9 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 777 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Burgos v. Hopkins (1994), DeCintio v. Westchester County Medical Center (1987)

178 federal appellate · 9 district · 26 state decisions

31401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 777 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party ... whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the nature of the forum and the importance of the claim in the prior litigation, the incentive and initiative to litigate and the actual extent of litigation, the competence and expertise of counsel, the availability of new evidence [and] the differences in the applicable law.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'to the quasi-judicial determinations of administrative agencies when rendered pursuant to adjudicatory authority'”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.