Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 Ohio App. 83 - Benjamin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

62 Ohio App. 83 - Benjamin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1959
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the allegations in a petition and the evidence offered in support thereof call for the application of the rule of res ipsa loquitur, and where-the defendant has offered evidence-tending to meet and explain the circumstances, it is the duty of the court, when requested so to do by either party, to submit the question to the jury under proper instructions. “The weight of the inference as well as the weight of the explanation offered to meet the inference is for the determination of the jury in a jury trial or for the determination of the court when the court is the trier of the facts.” '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.