← 62 Ohio App. 3d 359 - State v. Thrower

62 Ohio App. 3d 359 - State v. Thrower’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

cited by 58 later decisions

states following

August 2023

most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably 20 Cal. 4th 150 - People v. Grant (1999), 151 Ohio App. 3d 103 - State v. Siferd (2003)

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Mathews v. Eldridge · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Goss v. Lopez · Roth v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““No person employed by, or associated with, any enterprise shall conduct or participate in, directly or indirectly, the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of corrupt activity or the collection of an unlawful debt.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 92 Ohio App. 3d 221 - State v. Haddix · 62 Ohio App. 3d 396 - State v. Giffin
“'Enterprise' includes any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, union, government agency, or other legal entity, or any organization, association, or group of persons associated in fact although not a legal entity. 'Enterprise' includes illicit as well as licit enterprises.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 62 Ohio App. 3d 396 - State v. Giffin · State v. Montoya
“[w]hen a defendant pleads guilty and then affirmatively raises the issue of allied offenses, the trial court *Page 10 must conduct a hearing to determine whether any of the offenses to which the defendant has pleaded are allied offenses of similar import with a single animus.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Walker, 24240 (12-31-2008) · State v. Banks, 24259 (12-10-2008)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.