Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 OHIOST2D 291 - State v. Pearson

State v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2007 · most notably State v. Tyler (1990), State v. Williams (1988)

27 state decisions

170198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington v. Texas · Crawford v. United States · State v. Wolery · Cool v. United States · 5 Ill. 2d 251 - People v. Crump

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order for the prosecution to satisfy the corroboration requirement of R.C. 2923.03 (D), independent evidence must support an accomplice's testimony, and must tend to connect the accused with the alleged crime or must tend to identify the accused as a guilty actor. ( State v. Myers , 53 Ohio St.2d 74 , 372 N.E.2d 356 , approved and followed.).”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““No person shall be convicted of complicity under this section solely upon the testimony of an accomplice, unsupported by other evidence.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““(1) Solicit or procure another to commit the offense; “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense; “(3) Conspire with another to commit the offense in violation of section 2923.01 of the Revised Code; “(4) Cause an innocent or irresponsible person to commit the offense.” (R.C. 2923.03[A].)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.