Barker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably 145 Ohio App. 3d 824 - State v. Hilbert (2001), State ex rel. Gains v. Rossi (1999)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Logan v. United States · Williams v. State of North Carolina · Huntington v. Attrill · May v. Anderson · Nevada v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“remedial provisions are to be liberally construed to promote their purposes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. [J.S. · State v. Cain“Since each state has both the constitutional authority to enact its own laws, and the corollary right to apply them with respect to persons or events within its borders in a manner consistent with the limits of due process, the Full Faith and Credit Clause [of the Constitution of the United States] does not ordinarily compel the displacement of local law with the conflicting law of another state, notwithstanding the undeniable applicability of the conflicting law in the other jurisdiction with reference to the same persons or events.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fenton v. Fischer“To require Ohio to subordinate its announced policy, however wise or unwise it may be, for that of the lex loci delictus, would be repugnant to this state's interests with respect to its residents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fenton v. Fischer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.