Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 Okla. 33 - In Re Combs' Estate

In Re Combs' Estate’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 1965
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1965

13 state decisions

60191619201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros. · United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co. · Hill v. Hill · Am. Nat. Bank of McAlester v. Mergenthaler Linotype · Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Furman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The case in this court coming nearest to sustaining the motion to dismiss is Jordan v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co., 42 Okla. 804 , 143 Pac. 46 . In that case, however, there was 'no certificate whatever, and the request to amend was first made upon rehearing and after a final decision dismissing the cause had been rendered by this court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““As now amended there is a proper transcript attached to the petition in error: The amendment has like force and effect, as though ‘originally incorporated’ in the record before us. By .the very terms of the statute the amendment relates back to the date of filing and makes perfect as of that date that which was before imperfect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.