Taffe v. Smyth’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 1951
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hicklin v. McClear · McClung v. McPherson · Umatilla Irrigation Co. v. Barnhart · Darling v. Miles · Henderson v. Reynolds
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When an action is tried by stipulation without the intervention of a jury, and from the evidence received findings of fact are made upon all the disputed questions to which the parties in the pleadings have narrowed their respective allegations, such conclusions will not be disturbed on appeal unless it satisfactorily appears, from an inspection of the bill of exceptions, that application was made to the trial court for further or different findings, and the request therefor denied: Hicklin v. McClear, 18 Or. 126 ( 22 Pac. 1057 ); Umatilla Irr. Co. v. Barnhart, 22 Or. 389 ( 30 Pac. 37 ); McClung v. McPherson, 47 Or. 73 ( 81 Pac. 567 , 82 Pac. 13 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maddox v. McHattan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.