People v. Cardenas’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
5
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Ake v. Oklahoma · Matthews v. Price · Richard Norman Rojem v. Gary Gibson · Allen v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all indigent persons who are charged with or held for the commission of a crime are entitled to legal representation and supporting services at state expense, to the extent and in the manner provided for in articles 1 and 2 of title 21, C.R.3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Stroud“[ilf [dlefendant wants the state to pay the costs of his attorney and supporting services, his only choice is to be represented by the public defender, or in the case of a conflict, a state-appointed alternate defense counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Orozco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.