Naugle v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp. · 55 Pa. Commw. 465 - Fashion Hosiery Shops v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board · Interstate United Corp. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Schofield v. Commonwealth · Artrip v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.. . The term ‘injury arising in the course of employment’ as used in this article, . . . shall include all other injuries sustained while the employe is actually engaged in the furtherance of the business or affairs of the employer, whether upon the employer’s premises or elsewhere, and shall include all injuries caused by the condition of the premises or by the operation of the employer’s business or affairs thereon, sustained by the employe, who, though not so engaged, is injured upon the premises occupied by or under the control of the employer, or upon which the employer’s business or affairs are being carried on, the employe’s presence thereon being required by the nature of his employment. As amended March 29, 1972, P.L. 159, No. 61, § 7, 77 P.S. § 411.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.