¶1Affirmed.
¶2(dissenting) .
¶3It is my opinion that the case should be reversed on authority of Casino Amusement Co. v. Ocean Beach Amusement Co., 101 Fla. 59, 133 So. 559.
¶4SEBRING, €. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
62 So. 2d 50
Decided June 13, 1952
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1952-06-13
Relies on Casino Amusement Co. v. Ocean Beach Amusement Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1952-06-13
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1992
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Affirmed.
¶2(dissenting) .
¶3It is my opinion that the case should be reversed on authority of Casino Amusement Co. v. Ocean Beach Amusement Co., 101 Fla. 59, 133 So. 559.
¶4SEBRING, €. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.