62 So. 2d 759 - Astor Electric Service v. Cabrera’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2000
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas Pacific Railway Company v. Emma Humble · Matney v. Blue Ribbon, Inc. · Turner v. State · Coker v. Hayes · Traglio v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Many jurisdictions in this country are committed to the rule that affidavits of jurors may be admitted to explain and uphold their verdict but never to impeach or overthrow it. This general rule has been qualified to the extent that affidavits of jurors * * * are never admitted * * * to reveal the circumstances which prompted their conclusion. Coker v. Hayes, 16 Fla. 368 ; Turner v. State, 99 Fla. 246 , 126 So. 158 ; Consolidated Rendering Co. v. New Haven Hotel Co., D.C., 300 F. 627 ; Wigmore on Evidence, 2nd Ed., Vol. 5, page 108, 64 C.F. Trial, par. 914." (Emphasis supplied.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.