Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 So. 3d 374 - Sands v. State

62 So. 3d 374 - Sands v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State · 469 So. 2d 68 - Edwards v. State · 936 So. 2d 357 - Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the facts and inferences point in favor of the defendant on any element of the offense with sufficient force that reasonable [jurors] could not have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty, then the proper remedy is for the appellate court to reverse and render. But if the evidence shows that reasonable and fair-minded persons, while considering the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard in the exercise of impartial deliberations, might have reached different conclusions on every element of the offense, then the evidence will be deemed to have been sufficient.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.