¶1 AFFIRMED. See Smith v. State, 59 So.3d 1107 (Fla.2011), (juror’s surname, without more, is insufficient to trigger inquiry as to whether strike was exercised for discriminatory reason); Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312, 318 (Fla.2007) (preservation of challenge to potential juror requires more than one objection; when trial court denies or grants peremptory challenge, objecting party must renew and reserve objection béfore jury is sworn).
62 So. 3d 684
Ortiz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 3, 2011
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-06-03
Relies on 961 So. 2d 312 - Carratelli v. State · 59 So. 3d 1107 - Smith v. State
Decided 2011-06-03