Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 SW3D 15 - Fugate v. Commonwealth

Fugate v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Wright v. Wright · Insurance Co. of North America v. United States Department of Labor · Peretz v. United States · Williams v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he right to be present at every critical stage of the trial protects a defendant against purposeful or involuntary exclusion but not voluntary exclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no reason, constitutional or otherwise, to create a rule that counsel cannot waive his client's presence at depositions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.