State v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Castillo v. United States · Cherokee Corp. of Linden, Virginia, Inc. v. Capital Skiing Corp. · Speth v. State · Heath v. State · Ex Parte Fierro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State must invoke one of the specific instances in which the Legislature has granted it the right to appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01. The State has not invoked a specific statute in this case; the only applicable ground is the State’s right to appeal “a sentence in a case on the ground that the sentence is illegal.” Tex.Code Crim. Proo. Ann. art. 44.01(b). Therefore, the State may only appeal this case if the trial court’s order granting appellee shock community supervision is an illegal sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Posey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.