Haase v. Glazner’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 113 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 157 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Knott (2003), Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture (2004)
10 federal appellate · 113 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))
Relationships
Relies on Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc. · McConnell v. Southside Independent School District · Hooks v. Bridgewater · KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp. · Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. Scharbauer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fraudulent inducement 'is a particular species of fraud that arises only in the context of a contract and requires the existence of a contract as part of its proof.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If in the face of the Statute of Frauds we permit Glazner’s fraud claim to the extent he seeks to recover the benefit of the unenforceable bargain, we deprive the Statute of any effect. The Statute exists to prevent fraud and perjury in certain kinds of transactions by requiring agreements to be set out in a writing signed by the parties. [Footnote omitted]. But that purpose is frustrated and the Statute easily circumvented if a party can use a fraud claim essentially to enforce a contract the Statute makes unenforceable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]ithout a binding agreement, there is no detrimental reliance, and thus no fraudulent inducement claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.