Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 Vt. 463

Waterman v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 15, 1890

Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1890-08-15

Eeplevin. Heard, upon general demurrer to the defendant’s plea in abatement at the December Term, 1889, Powers, J., presiding. Demurrer sustained. The defendant excepts.

Relies on Landon v. Roberts · Gray v. Flowers

Decided 1890-08-15

¶1The opinion of the court was delivered by

Taft, J.

¶2The plea in abatement begins and concludes with praying judgment. The matter pleaded is dehors the record. 'The plea should not begin, but conclude, with such prayer. In *464Landon v. Roberts, 20 Vt. 286, the plea was defective for other-reasons, and in Gray v. Flowers, 24 Vt. 533, it was treated as-a motion to dismiss; the precise point was not adjudged in either case. The commencement and conclusion of a plea, when, alike, define its character; are forms which tend to clearness and precision; in fact, “they make the plea,” and a mistake in. either in a plea in abatement is fatal. Whatever may have-been written against the technical rules applied to pleas in abate» ment, a form which determines whether a plea is in abatement" or bar is certainly not useless, and a prayer of judgment in the-beginning should not be regarded as surplusage as suggested by the learned judge in the first case above cited.

¶3Judgment a-ffirmed and muse remanded..

/62/vt/463 · .json · Public domain