Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 Wash. 653

Peacock v. Ratliff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1911

Washington Supreme Court · decided 1911-03-30

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered June 29, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1915

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1911-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Fullerton, J.

¶1(concurring) — The instructions quoted in the majority opinion are erroneous, since they authorize a personal judgment against the wife on a community debt incurred by the husband. Inasmuch,.however, as the appellant does not obj ect to them on that ground, and does not complain of the fact that such a personal judgment was entered, I concur in the order of affirmance.

¶2Gose, J., concurs with Fullerton, J.

/62/wash/653 · .json · Public domain