Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 Wash. 2d 309 - State v. Rose

62 Wash. 2d 309 - State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak (1986), 110 Wash. 2d 504 - State v. Belgarde (1988)

32 state decisions

1501963197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. State of Arizona · State v. Evans · State v. Peeples · State v. Buttry · State v. Navone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The best rule for determining whether remarks made by counsel in criminal cases are so objectionable as to cause a reversal of the case is, Do the remarks call to the attention of the jurors matters which they would not be justified in considering in determining their verdict, and were they, under the circumstances of the particular case, probably influenced by these remarks.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “As thus defined, its application in describing appellant might be a permissible deduction from the evidence when arguing to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'one whose sexual inclination is toward those of the individual's own sex rather than the opposite sex.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.