62 Wash. App. 135 - State v. Henshaw’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 114 Wash. 2d 77 - State v. Rempel · 115 Wash. 2d 445 - State v. Pryor · 108 Wash. 2d 458 - State v. McAlpin · 53 Wash. App. 916 - State v. Crutchfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an exception for acts . . . that are designed to subvert or defraud the criminal justice process generally and the proportionality goals of the SRA, specifically, is consistent with the intent of the act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.