Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 Wash. App. 186 - State v. Swanson

62 Wash. App. 186 - State v. Swanson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dutton v. Evans · Fleet Factors Corp. v. United States · 114 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Swan · 103 Wash. 2d 165 - State v. Ryan · 98 Wash. 2d 140 - State v. Parris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the statement contains no express assertion about past fact, (2) cross examination could not show the declarant’s lack of knowledge, (3) the possibility of the declarant’s faulty recollection is remote, and (4) the circumstances surrounding the statement . . . are such that there is no reason to suppose the declarant misrepresented defendant’s involvement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.