62 Wash. App. 34 - State v. Lua’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wrenn v. Weinberger · United States v. Holland · 110 Wash. 2d 183 - State v. Brayman · 100 Wash. 2d 508 - State v. Phelan · 101 Wash. 2d 259 - State v. MacIolek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny person who violates RCW 69.50.401(a)... in a public park...”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“An additional twenty-four months shall be added to the presumptive sentence for any ranked offense involving a violation of chapter 69.50 RCW if the offense was also a violation of RCW 69.50.435.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution for a violation of this section that the prohibited conduct took place entirely within a private residence, that no person under eighteen years of age or younger was present in such private residence at any time dining the commission of the offense, and that the prohibited conduct did not involve delivering, manufacturing, selling, or possessing with the intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver any controlled substance in RCW 69.50.401(a) for profit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.