Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 Wis. 2d 605 - Simpson v. State

62 Wis. 2d 605 - Simpson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2019

18 state decisions

8019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Shoffner · Nelson v. State · 45 Wis. 2d 550 - York v. State · Duthey v. State · Lowe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As used in this chapter, the terms 'mental disease or defect' do not include an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The general rule in Wisconsin is that the admission of opinion evidence rests largely in the discretion of the trial court. York v. State (1970), 45 Wis.2d 550, 559 , 173 N.W.2d 693 . The opinion testimony of lay witnesses has been admitted in evidence on many subjects. It has been considered on the issue of insanity. Lowe v. State (1903), 118 Wis. 641 , 96 N.W. 417 ; Duthey v. State (1907), 131 Wis. 178 , 111 N.W. 222 ; Robinson v. State (1910), 143 Wis. 205 , 126 N.W. 750 .” Id. at 609.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “lay witness categorically has the right to give opinion testimony on the issue of insanity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.