Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 A2D 222 - Feleke v. State

Feleke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2015

15 state decisions

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Fensterer · Kentucky v. Stincer · United States v. Owens · Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co. · Keys v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the Statute does require that the out-of-court declarant be subject to cross examination, it does not expressly require any specific quality of cross examination or key the admission of the out-of-court statement to any particular recall in court on the part of the witness. To the contrary, the draftsmen of the Statute expressly contemplated that the in-court testimony might be inconsistent with the prior out-of-court statement. One of the problems to which the Statute is obviously directed is the turncoat witness who cannot recall events on the witness stand after having previously described them out-of-court. We conclude that there is nothing in the Statute or its intent which prohibits the admission of the statements on the basis of limited courtroom recall. Id. at 127.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In. all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused hath a right to ... meet the witnesses in their examination face to face....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.