Bradley v. Milliken’s Empirical Analysis
620 F.2d 1141 · 1980
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2000 · most notably In Re Diana R Beard et Als, In re Beard (1987)
15 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bullock v. United States · Keyes v. School District No 1 Denver Colorado · Estes v. Tasby · Tasby v. Estes · Bradley v. Milliken
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“create new programs (where necessary) to maintain the current level of bilingual/bicultural offerings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradley v. Milliken“make provisions for bilingual/bicultural programs”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradley v. Milliken“for the limited purpose of presenting evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.